Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Market Melt-up in Progress

Market Melt-up in Progress

Posted to Premium Subscribers Nov. 7, 2013

It seems like the US government shutdown has put pretty much everything on hold.  The US stock market was on ‘PAUSE’, tapering has been pushed back until March, and yields remain depressed.   Any incentive to rotate from yield into more growth oriented stocks has been taken away.  As tapering rumors started last spring persisted, you saw a clear rotation into more risk adverse stocks.  Growth stocks like FB, LNKD started to lead the sector rotation are now consolidation while yields remain depressed.

What the shutdown did do was ensure the status quo for another 6 months.  It is actually healthy, creating a strong base for next launching pad which seems to be starting this in early November.  The great ‘meltup’ is beginning, lack of sellers in the market, continued confidence and QE is ensuring that this market will end the year at record highs.  The INDU, which was topping out on fear of tapering has a new breath of life.   Yield seekers continue to dominate the market, the US banks will continue to lead the way; cyclicals will start to show life’ signalling we are on the verge of the next leg in this bull market.    Yes, I said next leg in this bull market.  I fully expect the global indexes to reach record highs over the next few years as Europe comes out of recession with the US continuing to lead the economic recovery.  
The big question that everyone wants to know is what will tapering do to the markets when it happens? 

I see many headlines saying that this a QE fueled market.  Well it is.  But it is more than that.  The markets are at a point where they are damned if you do and damned if you don’t.  Except this case damned to go higher no matter what happens scenario.  The only chance I give of market going lower is if we have an absolute unforeseen economic collapse on a magnitude similar to 2008.
Well guess what people?  Chances of that happening are 0%.

Will the markets drop like gold?  I doubt it.  If they were going to, they would have already done so in advance like gold has done.  What it means is most people are looking for a continued recovery in the segment called “life after QE”… starring of course FED Chair Janet Yellen.

The big concern at the FED isn’t going to be the stimulus and cutting back and potential inflation and jobs.  No they are not concerned about how the FED can taper and still maintain control of interest rates.  When rates spiked this summer on taper talk, I took notice.  I also took notice on how fast Ben came out to jawbone rates lower when he basically did a complete 180 on policy within days.   In reality, the language used this summer was most likely a test to see what would happen to rates if they did taper and the FED got their answer.  So Janet’s task is huge… how to taper, but at the same time talk interest rates down.

Can she do it?  If she does… she should look for a second career in Hollywood after her term at the FED is done.

Wife Pimper to Continue

In early 2012 I wrote an article describing a ‘wife pimper’ rally ahead of us.  So after 20 months is it over?  Hell no.  The ‘wife pimping’ part of the rally is still yet to begin.   Some people on Wallstreet call it a face ripper… but those people have a shallow understanding of the market.  It’s a ‘Wife Pimper’.



What do I mean about wife pimping?

Well… desperate times call for desperate measures… and in desperate times when you need money… you do desperate things… like pimp out your wife.  That extra $100 could turn into a Ferrari if you get it into the market quick enough!!!
 Are people really going out and pimping their wives and buying stock with the extra cash?

No.  Well maybe some might do it, but generally if you are a person with somewhat normal values; it is probably not something that has crossed your mind.  Who knows why it crosses my mind.  What I am trying to get across about the rally is to try and get an accurate picture of the greed associated with these ‘face ripping’ ‘wife pimping’ type rallies. 

What is driving this market to insane heights?  Greed of course.  What will eventually drive higher PE ratios into the market?  Greed.  What keeps people committed to a stock beyond what is anywhere near rational?  Greed.  When I talk about ‘wife pimping’, I am really trying to capture and describe the extent of the greed in the market.  Now you really got to be one greedy muther fucker to pimp out your wife in any situation.

What is the saying about pigs getting slaughtered?

The notion of greed will drive a bull market well into the extra innings.  It will drive this market for years to come.  It is going to drive this market higher.  The catalyst may be rising rates, it may be QE to infinity… who really knows the mind of the shadow US govt?  A mind that seems to change on a whim these days.

What I do know is that the markets are breaking out to all-time highs AND THERE IS NOTHING HOLDING THESE MARKETS BACK.  NOTHING.

Wife pimping literally translates that you will do anything to get into the market.  Literally anything.  Including pimping out your wife.   What would real life signs of pimping out your wife be?  Maybe mortgaging your entire house 3 times to get maximum leverage in the market.  Who knows?  What I do know is that we are nowhere near that type of sentiment, but at some point I expect to get there.

A Correction Coming?  

Not in this Damned if you do and Damned if you don’t market.
  1. No tapering = stock markets go higher
  2. Tapering means = Stock markets go higher.

At any rate, when I am seeing typical rotation into higher risk growth oriented stocks, these are signs that the next leg in the bull market is about to begin.   These are signs that the US recovery will continue well into 2014 /2015 and most likely right through to 2020 with little pause for thought or reflection here and there like we have now.

What is the invisible hand behind this market that will scoop up any sell-off?

Rising rates set to push Equities into the Stratosphere

How is this possible in a rising interest rate environment?  It really seems contrary to common economic logic.  Right?  Higher interest rates usually mean a slower economy which means equities enter a bear market.  Well that is true in a normal economy with normal interest rates.

Rates simply are anything but normal.    

Rates are so low and so compressed that pretty much any and all debt are extremely exposed at these record low interest rates.  This is the underlying invisible hand pushing up the market.   Any jump in rates is going to annihilate the principal on a lot of debt as everything gets revalued for increasing rates.  Even treasuries are going to get hit at first.  The first leg of the bull market was driven by yield and value seekers.  Those guys are still in happy they got high yielding investments and will never exit those positions as long as rates are this low.  They certainly won’t be buying debt until rates have somewhat normalized.

Many investors will seek to ‘weather the storm’ in the equities markets.  Simply put, for many investors who are seeking to protect their principal, there is no alternative investment except equities or cash.

During a period where interest rates are normalizing from artificially low which in this case is zero…. It really is like one big science experiment in action.  We have never been here before so one can’t really tell you what is going to happen.   What I do know is the greedy pigs in the debt market after 30 years are about to get slaughtered.  Rates cannot stay lower forever and as soon as tapering happens… rates will rise no matter what the FED sets the treasury rate at.

So if you are a bond holder… are you confident in Janet Yellen’s ability to jawbone the market while she tapers?  This is going to be very interesting to see how much control they have when they are not printing money and buying all the surplus treasuries.  

Will rising interest rates squash economic growth?

The answer simply is no.  Normalization will have minimal impact on the economy.  Rates are so low, banks have had zero incentive to lend.   In fact increased rates may even provide incentive for increased bank lending to small business because increased reward means banks will take larger risks.  Rates are so far below historical norms there is zero lending to small business.  Leveraging small business is what really drives the economy.   Sure banks are lending to corporations, but those loans are not for growth oriented operations, but more for corporations taking advantage of super cheap borrowing costs in simple accounting decisions.  These loans do nothing to leverage the economy but rather streamline a company’s balance sheet and income statement with historical low borrowing costs simply by locking in ‘free money’ and take advantage of low rates courtesy of Alan Greenspan and now Ben Bernanke.

The bottom line is that if interest rates rise, banks may have more incentive to lend to small business therefore enhancing economic growth in a rising interest rate environment.   Lending to corporations does not leverage the economy.  Lending to small business does.  Even a jump of 1.5 to 2% over 2 to 3 years would do no harm and most likely increase bank lending to small business which would thus give the economy the shot in the arm it needs when it comes to growth.

 Don’t cut taxes.  Don’t give out lucrative subsidies.  Just allow things to normalize and guess what…?

The US economy will continue to motor along

The last 4 years since March, 2009, the markets have continually climbed a ‘Wall of Worry’.   The market has rallied on extremely discounted prices and value and has been driven up on the backs of yield seekers who are desperately seeking income.   The markets will continue to climb that wall of worry as tapering worries and fears that markets need the punch bowl.  Hell no.  What the markets need is the punch bowl taken away.
  • Forget about any type of meaningful correction.
  • Forget about savers leaving the market and taking profits.
  • Forget about low growth meaning markets can’t rise.
  • Forget about PE ratios staying in bear market territory.  Hell, when it’s all said and done… we may have P/E ratios at record highs and analysts calling the market cheap. 
Markets will continue to climb the wall of worry.  We may even be at a crux of a sentiment change in the market where the ‘wall of worry’ disappears entirely into the all out wife pimping bull I described… but even if it doesn’t… this is a market that is lacking sellers and will melt up at a moment’s notice.

I think tapering and rates easing up will help the meltup and provide a perfect catalyst as debt holders look for creative ways to protect their capital.  What better way than participating in one of the greatest bull runs in a generation?  But that is just me. 

Social Media Tech Stocks Leading Sector Rotation

One signal I am getting is the massive push in social media tech stocks.  This is something that is more than a FAD.  For many people these social media stocks are a way of life.  They are not going away and are just at the beginning of being able to monetize these massive information assets.  The fact that social media stocks are on the rise and in favor means that investors see an environment of growth and lower risk for years, and not just 12 months out.  This is a sign of a very healthy market and one that is slowly pushing out on the risk curve into growth bellweathers such as Facebook and LinkedIn.  This is definitely confirmation you want to rotate into more cyclical and growth oriented names, unfortunately in Canada, cyclical stocks means materials, which for the most part are not going to participate and are not going to come along for the ride like they have in the past 10 years.  The developed world is powering ahead… not the developing world.
FB traded above $50 briefly, Groupon has also been a success story this year and LinkedIn continues to power higher.  The $14B Twitter IPO is perfectly timed taking advantage of a healthy sector that looks to continue to grow with little investment alternative in the sector.  The timing gives Twitter a huge runway/launching pad to run with the bulls.  Even at the revised IPO price, there is ample room for Twitter to run.  Its financials are poor, but on the other hand, Twitter brand power and reach which gives it huge potential if properly monetized.    If you are going to own social media… you have to own the big 3 which means you own FB, LinkedIn and Twitter.    That being said…. Twitter still has to prove a revenue model.

Over the short term I favor Twitter over FB and LinkedIn which have already gone on massive runs this year and are not priced for entry or re-entry.  Twitter on the other hand is priced for entry and ready to rock and roll and take advantage of momentum and hype while FB and LNKD find better entry points for 2014 buyers.   If you are looking at entry prices for these companies, FB entry looks between $38 to $40 and may test the IPO price while LNKD entry would be sub $200 preferably near the 50 and 200 day moving averages.   I might be dreaming on FB touching its IPO price.  Revenue is how you should value these companies and their corresponding year over year revenue growth and the revenue potential for these companies is staggering and for Facebook….  GOOGLE-like.   These companies have for the most part locked in users for the rest of their lives.  Facebook has how many habitual users?  Do you know how valuable that is?

Just from personal experience and the ads I experience on Facebook, I am much more receptive to the ones on Facebook than most other sites.  Sometimes I even click on them simply because they are targeted and non-invasive.  Most other sites when an ad comes on, I mute and look at another web page for a minute so while the ad plays while on Facebook, at least for me anyways are far more effective.  In the long run, this type of advertising has much more value than a spot say on ESPN.com selling a car that targets 1 in every 1,000 people.   I even don’t mind them in my news feed if it has content and it’s relevant.   I think once tweaked, these ads will be more effective than paying for $1M TV commercials… especially when it comes to a direct relationship between increasing sales.  Companies will eventually get it and Facebook will rule the advertising just because of the effectiveness of targeting a specific audience.  

Facebook could have a revenue model that dwarfs Google simply because of efficacy.  Twitter has the same type of potential with ads showing up in your twitter feed.  The one problem I see with twitter is that they will have a harder time targeting their audience than Facebook simply because Facebook knows that much more about you.

The New Tech Stocks…
Company Symbol Share price EPS Revenue 2013 Year/year Growth Market Cap
 
Facebook FB $48.69 $0.24 $7.4B 45% $118B
LinkedIn LNKD $228.28 $0.33 $1.5B 55% $23B
Twitter TWTR $23 - $25 N/A $600M N/A $10B - $13B
Groupon GRPN $10.65 -$0.14 $2.2B 7% $7.1B
Zynga ZNGA $3.71 -$0.08 $1.0B (20%) $2.4B
Yelp YELP $66.83 -$0.21 $230M 70% $3.6B
Zillow Z $80.05 -$0.33 $200M 72% $3B

So while tapering has been pushed back and yields continue to be pressed… sector rotation has paused.  Yield hunters are back and the market will slowly churn forward.   FB and LNKD should correct, especially while the Twitter IPO shines during the month of November making those two stocks better entries in late November early December.   But I cannot stress the one company I would exposed to as early as tomorrow and taking a position in first is Twitter.  Buy the IPO or wait; you may get it cheaper the first week it trades because generally you have profit takers from IPO shareholders who want to sell shares.  

But how much and how eager to sell?

That is a mystery so the price could do anything.  It really all depends on the appetite and how many inside sellers there market had to eat up.  With FB… there was a tonne of insiders who were eager to take the money and run.  What makes things even iffier is the fact the IPO priced was raised and on an earnings basis… TWITTER is more expensive than its peers.   There is now a better chance that the price cannot sustain the initial hype, but this will be an excellent time to pursue an entry.  Some say Twitter will double on the first day… I am skeptical… but who knows?   An entry of $20 would be ideal, but if it starts to run, buy it quick and don’t wait for a pullback.  A pullback at $30 won’t get you an entry anywhere near if you bought chasing the stock in the initial days.   What is going to tell a lot about Twitter in the first year is how fast they grow revenue quarter over quarter.

The investing environment is ripe for these big social media names.  The markets are looking to rotate and rising yields will force debt holders out of debt and into equities.  Twitter could easily trade on par with FB when it comes to share price and all these stocks could trade at crazy valuations for years just because of the Perfect Strom that is on the horizon for equities.  These are the high demand, hip names to own in the market.  Well except maybe Zynga.   Zygna has not been so lucky to turn the tide of sentiment.  It is pretty hard to convince the street that you can make money on a ‘free gaming model’ and have all but given up on pursuing a paid gaming model.  With revenues dropping 20% this year, Zynga has lagged but the chart looks like it wants to break out over $4.



If Zynga wants to establish a free gaming model, I hope to see some acquisition to establish a commanding market share position and create a model where top app makers hope to get bought out by Zynga while establishing ad revenue and other in game paid features.  If they can establish a top market presence, an ad revenue model could easily be established to derive revenue from free gaming model with millions of users.   That is the one problem with Zynga… they promote users while the market is looking at the top line growth.  The market is not convinced it can monetize those users are that they are worth as much as other social media stocks.  The potential for Zynga is there.  Execution is important and the company still needs to cut a lot of fat and firmly establish some sort of revenue model that encourages growth.


Thoughts on Uranium

Right now the uranium industry is holding its collective breathe. 

Actually, it is not just the uranium industry, but anyone who cares about the health of our global ecosystem should be concerned.  This summer TEPCO announced that thousands of gallons of radioactive water are leaking directly into the Pacific Ocean.  Radiation levels are up everywhere, cesium has been detected in plankton in all ten areas tested across the Pacific, and 30 months after the initial disaster when the world thought we would be healing from Fukushima, the opposite is happening.
Fukushima is getting worse.  

Until Fukushima is under control, there will be no relief for uranium stocks.  FIS/AMW could be one of the biggest and shallowest and high grading discoveries in the Athabasca Basin and no one is going to care and currently is extremely undervalued considering the magnitude of the discovery, especially when compared to buyouts such as Hathor’s Roughrider which sold to Rio Tinto for almost $600M.  With all the successful drilling this summer Fission should be at around $2, not $1.  Alpha Minerals and Fission’s combined market cap is $300M and change.  Only half of what Rio Tinto bought Hathor out for.

And PLS is infinitely better in every way….
  • In depth to surface.
  • In grade.
  • In zone width.
  • And even in strike length

There is no comparison.  PLS is much higher grade.  PLS has been traced along a much wider extend and the zone widths are massive when compared to Roughrider.  Then you take into account that a lot of the mineralization is less than 100 meters to surface… there is nothing like PLS in the Athabasca Basin.  PLS should at least be on par with Roughrider even before a 43-101 resource report based on the drill results and the metrics I suggested above.
But hence; you have Fukushima 30 months after the initial meltdown spewing radioactive material into the environment killing and maiming life thousands of kilometers away on the Pacific West Coast.  We pretty much have the worst case scenario unfolding before our eyes.

Don’t believe me? 

Here are 5 events this summer that speak otherwise that something is seriously wrong in the Pacific Ocean.
  1. May 22… Researchers find high cesium in some Pacific plankton
  2. June 29thMillions of krill wash up on Oregon, California beaches
  3. August 16… DFO investigating reports of bleeding herring
  4. October 24… Researcher: High death rate, ‘puzzling’ behavior in B.C. orcas
  5. October 26… Biologists search for cause of sea start deaths

So with the revelation that Fukushima is still spewing radioactive material, there is just no way that this sector gets off the ground.  Half the investment thesis revolves around the Japanese restarting nuclear operations.  I don’t care what Jim Dines says about shivering in the dark, you can always add an extra layer of clothes.  No big deal.  Eventually other countries like Russia and China will pick up the slack, but 48 nuclear reactors going offline is the equivalent demand to the entire HEU program.

So let’s do the math…
  • 432 nuclear reactors in operation before Fukushima.
  • 384 reactors in operation today.  
  • An 11% reduction in nuclear reactors. 
  • Japan required 20M to 22M pounds per year. 
  • HEU supplies approximately 24M pounds to the market.  Net effect?
 NIL without a nationwide restart of Japan’s nuclear program 

Then you have to count for the fact that the market has 50M pounds of excess uranium accumulating for 30 months of production without 20M pounds annually from Japan… and it is no wonder the spot price of uranium has drifted under $40 to $35 and in reality… no sign of relief until the excess supply is taken off the table.  And now Cameco has drastically shaped up operations and has dramatically reduced costs to $17.68 per lb making $34 quite profitable for the company while most Midwest USA mines and even in Namibia have a hard time competing against.  Cameco is still forecasting a $50 uranium price, but the market is saying otherwise and I have a hard time believing $40 uranium is in the cards without a Japanese restart.   



A Japanese Restart Likely?

I am not betting on one.  Politicians usually go with the will of the people and on this subject the most damning piece of information regarding nuclear energy in Japan, a poll in 2012 put Japanese at 80% opposed to nuclear energy and no longer trusted their government regarding radiation information.   So much for Jim Dines theory about shivering in the dark.  Apparently the Japanese have chosen to shiver in the dark.  With Fukushima going off how it is; a huge cloud continues to loom over this sector.

And you think the worst is over? 

The worst may still be yet to come.  TEPCO last week accepted the US offer to help with the cleanup which will take years.  Sometime this November TEPCO will be removing the fuel rods from Unit 4.  One wrong move and horrific quantities of radiation could be released into the atmosphere or cause an explosion much worse than the original meltdown.   One of the biggest revelations yet have the World Nuclear Association coming out with a report stating radioactive materials released into the environment have been underestimated by the Japanese by a whopping  97%.

Nuclear is not somewhere I would be.  I might be exposed to FCU because of the fact it is a one of kind special delivery type of deal… but the entire investment climate has changed since TEPCO announced the contaminated water is still pouring into the Pacific Ocean.   In fact I just cannot see this one coming to life.

On the other hand… if good news does come out of Japan and things can be cleaned up and the healing process start… things could turn around and people could forget… but the pride of the Japanese and not asking for international help has most likely created an even bigger problem in the long run.   I always thought of nuclear as green energy because the contents can easily be stored and buried unlike atmospheric pollution.  But the disaster at Fukushima has me starting to think differently about nuclear energy being green.

Marijuana Stocks

A new theme that I will slowly be starting to pound the table on is Marijuana.  Marijuana is one of the biggest growth sectors of the 21st century.   First you have the medical marijuana which treats everything from back pain to IBS to diabetes to AIDS to curing cancer.  But you also have the recreational market which is being legalized in certain states.  In reality, this is the biggest wave in medicine on the horizon and will give the entire industry a big shot in the arm.  A lot of people are skeptical that the medical aspect is not worth it because you can’t patent a plant… point taken. 

What makes this industry so unique is the 100’s of different ailment it treats and it’s all because of Cannabinoids contained in the marijuana.  The great opportunity is taking these cannabinoids and increasing the concentrations well beyond what you exist naturally in a plant and in different combinations for different desired results.  There are 6 cannabinoids that have been studied extensively, but there are over a 100 different cannabinoids in the marijuana plant, each with different and unique properties.

That is what makes this the opportunity, the endless combinations and potential to treat numerous ailment a lot better and more efficiently.
Just by tweaking Mother Nature you can get a product that is 10 times better and more effective than what someone could ever smoke in a joint or vaporize or eat in brownie.  You can do in a lab what you can’t do in nature.  You can bring a product to market that you can patent and no one can replicate.  Just like any other pharmaceutical.  And the big point… the potential to revolutionize the market in so many different medicines and diseases.

The biggest prize is bringing a class of cannabinoids cancer drugs to market which represent a ZILLION dollar opportunity.  Cancer is the biggest epidemic of our time.  It dwarfs AIDS.  We will be here with cancer well after AIDS and other diseases have been eliminated.  Cancer isn’t something you catch; it is something that happens when your cells go bad, and with all the cancer causing things in today’s environment.  It is not going away.

And a cure?  Well I am of the opinion that cancer treatments will always be a reactionary medicine and the closest thing to a cure we find.

Colorado and Washington = $2B Recreational market

Then there is the recreational element.  This is another massive market opportunity.  It is estimated that just in Colorado and Washington were marijuana is legal; it will grow to a $2B plus market.  Just in those two states alone!!!  The next Bud-wiser will definitely grow up from among these companies that are just starting to pop up on the radar screen.  You still don’t have any public companies entering the recreational business or that are even legitimate enough to invest in yet, especially when there are medical companies which are much more legitimate.

Cannabis is still illegal in 48 states so the recreational part does not have the growth potential yet… but legalization in Colorado and the Washington States have set a trend for the rest of the country.  How fast will it happen?  It is hard to tell, but it is something that could have a snowball effect as more and more states start to push for legalization and decriminalization.  Portland Maine became the first city to legalize marijuana and there seems to be a push in California as well as Oregon.    At some point the Federal Government will enact country wide legislation.   If I were to guess, full legalization may happen sometime between 2016 and 2020.  It will probably be a very big issue in the 2016 election which may make the Hillary Clinton ticket unbeatable if she takes up the cause.   I think if anything; despite Obama being the pothead from rumors I have heard, this is an issue the democrats don’t want to let out of the armory too quickly.  That is just what I think at least.    If they have done their polling right… they will find that many Americans will vote in spite of partisan lines in favor of this issue while at the same time not dissuading people who are against it not to vote for them.    Maybe I got this one wrong.

At any rate, the great thing about this emerging growth sector is that you don’t have to hang your hat in just the legalization and the recreational aspect.  That is just another goodie to fall from the money tree later on.  The story right now is the medical marijuana market which is just as lucrative and much more open to exploitation.   GW Pharmaceuticals NSADAQ:GWPH who recently launched Sativex in the USA has tripled from a sub $9 low in July to a $32.75 high in late October.  This would be my favorite in the entire sector but at this time I think other companies are priced a little bit better.  If GWPH falls to $20 then it becomes a much more attractive buy.  The great thing about GW is that the company patents all their products and acts like a real pharma stock unlike the rest which are still in incubancy stage and trying to establish legitimacy. If there is a company on track for buyout for a bigger name to make a splash into the sector then GW is the obvious choice.

On the watch list I have 5 companies that I am watching closely and am familiarizing myself with.  This list will grow as the industry grows, but being the industry is what it is… these companies need to be scrutinized a little bit more. 

Company Symbol Product Market Cap
GW Pharmaceuticals GWPH Research, development, and commercialization of a wide range of cannabinoid prescription medicines.  Sativex is the company’s flagship drug approved in 20 countries to treat MS (spasms) with several other cannabinoid based drugs in the pipeline. $451M
Medical Marijuana Inc. MJNA Is a holding company that owns a variety of companies that are innovating products in the hemp/marijuana industry.  $134M
Cannabis Science CBIS Develop, produce, and commercialize novel cannabinoid based therapies for treatment of cancer and HIV $24M
CannaVest Corp CANV Produce raw/bulk Cannabinidoil (CBD) $313M
Nuvilex Inc NVLX Own subsidiary Medical Marijauna Sciences and applying CBD/THC to produce effective class of anti-cancer drugs $78M


New Picks!!!


Western Forest Products WEF-T

Shares Out… 260.9M
Market Cap... $407M


Since there is no respite in materials or gold for the next 2 or 3 years, I continue to persue other themes.  In fact, there is no guarantee that materials will come back for another generation.   Gold may come back, but I am not counting on it.  The Chinese are in no hurry to pick up growth to previous levels. Growth in China is morphing into value added growth.  It isn't about raw GDP growth and growing out, but more about China growing up.

So raw materials they still need… but they will want different raw materials.

They are no longer interested in manufacturing raw low cost goods so out the window is iron ore.  I doubt iron ore will ever come back, or if it does, it will because a nation like India decides to urbanize.  Instead the Chinese are turning to creating wealth in for society as opposed to the country where China has become great on the backs of slave labor of the majority of its citizens.  One way I keep preaching the Chinese will create wealth is buy pursuing a strong dollar policy and importing the wealth of other nations. They will import BC wood.  BC has high qulaity wood and is ideally located geograhically to become a major trading partner with China.

Telsa recently opened their first showroom in China which attracted a lot of young wealthy Chinese which is proof of this growing class in China.  As more and more Chinese come into wealth by China focusing on internal policies, BC lumber will be high on the value added list.   For BC, this is an emerging market that could spur growth for companies like Western Forest Products for the next decade and provide a market that may eventually be bigger than the US market.   Lumber companies are in the midst of a boom just like airlines… how do you know the economy is humming along?  Airlines and forestry companies are smooth sailing.

Yup.  Things must really be rosy.  I didn’t think lumber companies made money.

This is a multiyear bull run for companies like WEF which traded as low as $0.20 back in 2009 and nearly went out of business.  WEF is riding the USA housing recovery wave along with every other lumber company, but has the added benefit of a growing Pacific Rim trading partner who will be demanding more of BC softwood products as the Yuan continues to appreciate versus all currencies.  Forest products is one materials/resource that looks like it has a bright future over the next 2 to 3 years while the USA continues to recovery and China chugs along with polices that are focused on increasing Chinese wealth.


QHR Technologies QHR-V $0.97

Shares out… 48.0
Market Cap… $46M

QHR technologies is an example of a company that is melting up. QHR is perfect example of high growth company in the high growth medical sector with a product that makes everything more efficient.  The basically offer a suite of software modules that provide computer based medical records for family physicians, medical specialists, and surgeons.  A key component in the move throughout Canada and the rapid growth over the last five years was providing electronic healthcare records for all Canadians.

They are now taking their medical platform to the USA where Obamacare is being implemented and from the sounds of things, it looks like the USA GOVT has a problem with the technical software aspect of things.  I am not sure exactly whose QHR competition is or if they have any, but the rapid growth in Canada with revenue growing from $6.5M in 2008 to $29.5M in 2012, there is a huge opportunity if they can replicate this type of success in the States. 

At any rate, this company I have been watching since $0.50/$0.60 and like always...the $0.60 rule is a great predictor of stocks that take the next level.  So if you like KLH… I might suggest that there is still a lot of legs on QHR before it gets ‘pricey’.
NCI-V is another stock that is taking a break because it hit $0.60 and couldn’t crack it the first go around is going to drop back off… especially if it came from sub $0.20 where it came from.  You would like to see $0.40 hold, but sometimes they don’t and go right back down to where they came.   NCI came in with another great quarter putting the company on track to make $0.08 per share.    At $0.40 that is 5 times earnings and most likely a bottom if it gets there.  It is always nice when a company has earnings to supprot its share price.

Pretvim Update

Since I announced that PVG was a ‘balls to the wall’ buy… PVG and Snowden have been slapped with class action lawsuit in both Canada and the USA.  With the potential that POG has further to drop, it appears that PVG may drop even further before a bottom is firmly in.  I stress that this is an extreme buying opportunity and you are getting two quality deposits that both have merit as mines.  At the current price of $350m market cap, you are getting PVG for about $6 per ounce of gold which is a ridiculous price for a company with the extension to Seadridge’s KSM deposit which is going into production.  If this level breaks… I wouldn’t touch PVG until $2 or so but at that price the risk reward is massive.  

From the Oct. 31 new release regarding Pretium and a class action lawsuit filed in New York…

The Complaints allege that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, regarding the Company's mineral resources, probable reserves and the life of mine. Specifically, Defendants did not properly measure resources or probable reserves contained within the ore located at the Valley of Kings ("VOK") mining zone at the Brucejack Project and failed to disclose that its sampling methods were not in conformance with industry standards.

I am not exactly sure how big the disagreement in estimating techniques is, but I surmise that what PVG and Snowden have done is take partial high grade samples and extrapolate it across the entire high grade zone.  This technique is common in low grade deposits because the mineralization is quite consistent but in a high grade zone, generally the entire section should be analyzed.  If they have done this then the company may have a real legal problem because high grade is so variable and testing a nugget across a half meter sample in a zone as narrow as two meter could overstate the results, especially if the 0.5m section tested 1000 g/t and the rest tested 1 g/t.  All of a sudden 2 meters at 1,000 g/t becomes 2 meters at 250 g/t.  The big problem is that it is one industry professional opinion vs. another and in reality, if the gold is there, has there been a fraud committed?  

These situations are always tough, that is why I call it a balls to the wall buy… you really gotta have some big kahunas to dip your toe into this mess.  But like I have said before… the stock is so cheap… the entire high grade resource value has been stripped out of the stock and it trades on par to Seabridge.  It may get cheaper but I suggest even if gold drops to $1,000, the SP on Pretium will be insulated at the current prices.

If I had a millions dollars and someone put a gun to my head and said “spend it on a gold stock or I kill you”…  I would probably buy this one. 

 Mock Portfolio
Company Symbol Market Cap Earnings Industry
Stocks on the ‘buy’ list…
Kandi Technologies Group  KNDI $290M N/A Electric Vehicles
Macro Enterprises MCR-V $203M $0.61/sh. (6 mos.) Oil Services Industry
Cipher Pharmaceuticals DND-T $180M $0.19/sh. (6 mos.) Biotech industry – Absorbica
Stellar Biotechnologies KLH-V $141M N/A Biotech industry – KLH
Village Farms International VFF-T $46M $0.10/sh. (6 mos.) Agricultural  - Greenhouse tomatoes
Energizer Resources EGZ-T $30M N/A Graphite Mining
Sirona Biochem Corp SBM-V $16M N/A Biotech – skin lightening
MedX Health Corp MDX-V $5M N/A Biotech – Mole Mate
Zynga ZNGA $2.85B -$0.08/sh. Social Media Gaming
Groupon GRPN $6.45B -$0.14/sh. Social Media Tech
Pretvim PVG.T $347M N/A Distressed gold asset
Bitcoin BTC   N/A Currency
         
New additions…
QHR Technologies QHR-V $43M $0.01/sh. Medical Technologies
Enterprise Group E-T $67M $0.09/sh. Energy Services
Western Forest Products WEF-T $407M $0.20/sh. Forest Products
Nuvilex Inc NVLX $78M N/A Biotech
GW Pharmacueticals GWPH $451M N/A Biotech
         
Stocks on the ‘hold’ list…
Fission Uranium Corp.           FCU-V $166M N/A Uranium – PLS Discovery
Tesla Motors Inc. TSLA $20B $0.20/sh. (Q2) Electric Vehicles
Lomiko Metals LMR-V $5M N/A Graphite/Graphene
Barkerville Gold BGM-V $83M N/A Gold
NTG Clarity Networks NCI-V $18M $0.06 /sh. (9 mos) Tech Services
AgriMinco Corp ANO-V $7M N/A  
Canada Carbon CCB-V   N/A Miller Vein/Lump Graphite Mine
         
Stocks on the sell/sold/short list…
Labrador Iron Mines LIM-T     Iron Ore
Zenyatta Ventures ZEN-V     Amorphous Graphite
GTA Resources GTA-V     Mineral Exploration
West Africa Iron Ore Corp WAI-V     Iron Ore
         
           


Christopher Skidmore

Beat the Market Stock Picks

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Gold to Trade Under $1,000/oz in 2014

Gold to Trade Under $1,000/oz in 2014


This article (edited) was originally published to Premium Subscribers Monday September 23, 2013.

I wrote an article last week for Premium Subscribers and have decided to expand upon the original idea in that article and publish it to my 'free' lists.  One thing of note is that over the next 3 months is when I encourage investors/traders to sign up to my list as generally this is when I accept renewals.  I don't really care about how many subscribers I have, I have never written to make money, I just have a passion about certain things and have a keen understanding of business which I can apply across virtually any sector as is demonstrated in the small list below.  My Premium Letter has outperformed as usual with names like KLH.V, MCR.V, DND.TO, KNDI, GRPN, NCI.V and even ZYNGA doing quite well.  So sign up if want.  No pressure, but it is definitely worth the Bitcoin required to subscribe for a year.

Currently I only accept Bitcoin.  And at that you have to send it to me by registered mail. I will eventually accept electronic Bitcoin, but at this point in time I only accept physical Bitcoin payments. Yes Virginia, there is such a thing a physical Bitcoin.
 And I want every single one I can get my hands on...
If you want to send me the equivalent of 1 Bitcoin in gold and silver coins in weight I may consider adding you to my prestigious list. ;)  

Again.  The price of my newsletter is 1 physical Bitcoin.  Contact me if you are interested and I will give you the details.  I will continue to accept other payment methods from renewing subscribers... but just to let you know, I do prefer Bitcoin and at some point; Bitcoin will be the only way to 'pay' to subscribe to my premium newsletter.   

Sell Your Gold



Yes you heard it here at Beat the Market.  Sell your gold.  Gold will trade under $1,000 next year.  Sell physical gold, sell gold short on the spot contract, write calls, buy puts, do whatever you want to do... but sell your gold ASAP.  This is nothing new to Premium Subscribers at Beat the Market warned Premium Subscribers on February 6, 2013 about the impending gold crash in an article titled Gold... Nearing a Major Inflection Point.

Get it?  Sell it all and go as short as you can.  Gold is on track to trade under $1,000 in 2014.  I am sorry to say but the gold trade is over for now (at least for the next 12 to 18 months).  Markets look forward and there is nothing driving gold to the upside  in the short or medium terms except a threat of WW3 and possible extension of 'no tapering policies'.  So far the Americans have backed down from the Russians ultimatum regarding Syria and international peace regarding the issue has been established.  War mongers in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the US will have to figure out another way to destabilize Syria and get their NG pipeline into Europe.

The markets dodged the 'tapering bullet' in September, neither was I convinced they were going to in September, since Jobs data was nowhere near the 6.5% to 7.0% range the FED wants to start tapering.  So what happened when 'No Tapering' hit the headlines?  Well...  Gold spiked immediately but failed to break maintain critical levels above $1370 and has now established a downtrend.     POG has now failed another key level at $1340 and is now driving well under this critical price band between $1330 to $1340.  It has also flashed a head and shoulders pattern over the last two months indicating that an imminent price drop could happen at any moment.  If the neckline breaks much below $1300 (a key psychological level)... you could start seeing momentum to the downside we haven't seen since February to April time period.

The gold bug's arguments haven't played out in the last decade and the won't in the next unless a worst case scenario of an apocalyptic nature happens.  Don't be fooled by these guys, FEAR sells, but often our mildest fears never happen let alone worst case scenario's. The US DOLLAR isn't dead.  We don't have a USD that is falling through the floor.  Thinking that the USD is going to become the next Peso are compeltely unfounded.  The USA is not the next Wiemer Republic. Simply put... conditions jsut aren't right for things of this apocayptic nature to happen.  Could conditions become ripe for such a thing?  Possibly.  But alot of things have to come together all at the same time for that to happen and irhgt now there is no indication these fundamental conditions are in place.   One BIG REASON that the USD march to ZERO halted is because printing money is the norm in the modern world of economics.  It's not just the USA doing it.  In a world where everything is relative, when eveyone is doing the same thing and at proportionately greater levels... how can you acutally devalu the USD?  The Japanese do it.  The British do it. The Brazilians do it.  Everyone does it. Even the Chinese do it.  Kind hard to deflate your currency when everyone does the same thing.

So you would think that Gold would track to the moon with these conditions, right?  

WRONG!!!  Simply put, Gold is not an alternative currency.  Gold is not money.  At best; gold is a financial asset and tracks global 'real inflation' over monetary debasment.  The gold market is riddled with flaws and is a poor choice to protect your money in real terms.  

Here are some problems with gold... 
  • You can't spend gold.
  • It isn't subdividable.
  • It is finite and costly to mine, let along find.
  • It is a very small market when thinking about global assets.
  • Its not driven by theoretical values of money
In short... gold is pretty and it makes really nice jewelry and is prestigious.  But it is a poor financial asset and is definitly does not meet the definition of money.  It may be a unit of account and a store of value... but gold is definitely not a medium of exchange. Try spending an American Eagle (1oz gold coin) in a store.  The clerk is legally oblgiated to give you $50 on monetary value.

"Money is any object or record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts in a given socio-economic context or country.  The main functions of money are distinguished as: medium of exchange (no); a unit of account (yes); store of value (yes); and, occasionally in the past, a standard of deferred payment. Any kind of object or secure verifiable record that fulfills these functions can be considered money."

So why is isn't gold exploding tracking the debasement of leading global currencies?  

Because there is no inflation. This is not the Wiemar republic that printed money to pay a population.

For all good intentions of modern day QE, the reality is that none of this money ever really enters the system on a grand scale. It is meant to prop up the financial system.  Prop up the banks.  Prop up the fraudsters in Congress and on Wall Street.  You are not seeing major work programs like FDR implemented in the 1930's and 1940's.  You are not seeing govt create new demand with QE.  Nope.  It is meant to save the financial system, because the real dollars haev been scraped out of the system by the 1%. You are not seeing mass subsidies to get people into homes.  You are not seeing huge increases in lending to small business.  US growth topping out at 2.5%???  For all intensive purposes the US is already in a period of stagflation if you account for 'real inflation' increases in food and energy prices.  

For all intesnsive purposes... I believe the USA and Canada and most other developed and Westernized econmies are in a period of stagflation.  

When did we have stagflation?  In the 1970's.  What did gold do in the 1970's?  It was quite volatile.  It made a huge run up in the initial period when inflation initially took off and gold soared to $800 (infaltion adjusted) but then it crashed back down to $400 losing 50% of its value. If gold repeats this pattern during this period of stagflation, then you could expect $1800 to bottom at $900 in a 24 to 36 month consolidation.  I am not saying POG is not going to head even higher due to factors like the FED may never stop QE and may put the foot on the gas again in a few years to fight another recession... but ultimately I believe we are in a period of extreme volatility similar to the 1970's for which gold in my opinion is still firmly entrenched in a bear market.

So why would you buy gold when you short term indicators indicating further downside AND uncertainty about continuation about the overall bull in gold? 

Seems pretty silly to me unless you have fallen in love with a the Yellow Metal.  What would you wife think when you laid down to bed at night adding, Goodnight gold, I love to your regular bedtime chatter with your spouse?

Clearly, she would think you have lost and would have you selling all your gold the next day.

Will we see that ultimate parabolic spike like we did in the early 80's?  The gold bugs are still certainly convinced.  But those guys have had the same arguments for the last 35 to 40 years.  Even a broken clock is right twice a day.  I don't want to say soemthing is going to happenig when clearly it is not happening ad the conditions that make such a rally are no where to be seen.

Clearly... POG is a BIG FAT SELL.   If you want to buy your gold back,... buy it back at the cost the gold miners produce it at. Most of the CEO's at these huge miners are still in LALALALA land about the prospects about POG.  The group beleives their own dribble to the point they judgement is clouded and like I always say... the proof is in the pudding.


None of these guys have imlemented hedging programs... Watchout.  When gold breaks below $1200.. there is going to be a scramble by producers to hedge the next 12 to 18 months productiom.  The smart ones have started doing it... but finding a smart gold mining  CEO  these days is not that easy since al the smart ones have retired with small fortunes and moved on to bigger and better things.


We may see that ultimate spike in the later half of the decade, but the fundamentals on the macro level are not in place for this to happen. Not yet.  Continued global debasement will eventually leak into the system and will eventually devalue currencies worldwide.  But will this drive gold higher?  Only if it is seen as an alternative currency and gold at the present moment is losing its appeal in that category in favor of crypto currencies like Bitcoin which actually serve that purpose while gold is struggles just to maintain its relevance as a financial asset. Clearly it does not track global fiat currency debasement.

Maybe I am just young and don't see the appeal of gold... but why would I buy gold as an alternative currency when I can buy Bitcoin?  I can easily spend Bitcoin.  It is not debasable.  The only way to make it cheaper is to subdivide it... which they will eventually do as Bitcoin tracks well over a $1,000 in the coming years. That my friends is a true alternative currency.

Gold will eventually float too... but only as other, more favorable products enter their 'deemed' market valuation.  gold will be consdiered the poor cousin to Bitcoin simply because gold does not perform as a true medium of exhcange.  On the other hand... as global debasement continues or abates.... Bitcoin is clearly 'undervalued'.

One key element that is missing and is still debateable that will happen for POG to make its ultimate parabolic spike.... interest rates need to make a sharp turn and the US needs to lose thier ability to set their own interest rates.  You want conditions that mimic 30 to 40 years ago?  Interest rate need to go to 15% to 20% first.  Or at least be well on track for that.

If global debasement continues...  it is possible that this may happen to the US???
YES
But at this point in time... that is not likely and the US has no appetite to raise rates 1% or 2% let alone see GOVT T-Bills paying out close to 10%.

A review of the ST fundamentals....  
  • US tapering fears
  • Similarities with stagflation in 1970's when gold oringially spiked and then dropped 50% in value
  • European Crisis abating 
  • NO FEAR anywhere
  • Low growth environment
  • Abating inflation for things like food and energy
  • zero wage inflation
  • uncertainty about timeline of global QE programs.
The US has gone through a period of major food and energy price inflation with little or no wage growth.  Second half stagflation will see low growth persist and inflation due to natural wage increase response over the second half of the decade.    If you see wage price increase during 2015 to 2020 and continued global QE.  Eventually these conditions with rising rates will and put a bottom in the price of gold.  But at this point in time it is definitely not $1200 per oz.  POG could easily drop to $700 to $900 where the cost of production is for a lot of major mines and targeted cost of prodction for major new prodcution for mines like Detour Lake and Malartic.  These are two massive operations I watch very closely because if you want any more gold out of the ground, you are going to have to mine these types of deposits and account for 1.5M ounces of potential new production when operating at capacity.  

So what do we have left in the short term bull gold camp? 

Are you going to buy gold because you think WW3 breaks out?  Maybe on the confirmation of a global war I might consider a trade depending on the variables involved, but to be invested in gold under the guise that global conflict might escalate is shear stupidity.  Are the Chinese o ntnhe verge of dumping US treasuries on the open makret as an act of aggression?  NO.  We had a nice little rally this summer, and as predicted POG topped out in the last week of August and is now in a downtrend.

My gut says that this October you do not want to be long gold.  This is an unwinding of the US monetization trade and as Ben leaves the FED, so does this trade OFFICIALLY END.  Please take heed of this advice.  The Gold Bull is definitively over, or at least on HOLD; and as more and more people realize this liek the dumb dinosaur Gold Mining CEO's... you are going to see major momentum to the downside.  When does this happen?  I don't know.... but I do know that the bear market is continuing and technically for the last few weeks, the alarm bells kept ringing that this is a trade that you want nothing to do with.  

The rally after Ben announcing no taper was a relief 'get me the hell out' rally at best.  The selling after the initial burst is your first clue that you do not want to own gold. Here is the second clue.  Gold just flashed a major technical sell signal.

Which one you ask?

Only a head and shoulder pattern developing. The neckline is $1270 to $1300 and once those two critical areas of support break there is only resistance at $1200 before POG enters FREEFALL MODE.  



The breakdown this February to June will seem like child's play as this next breakdown is almost certain to lead gold well under $1000 per ounce next year.  Gold could lose up to 50% of its value over the next 12 to 18 months and this is just not something most of you will want to eat in your 'net wrorth' calculation.  The commodities super bull is over or at least on an extended break, and there are no signs anywhere this will abate any time soon! The US is reigning in spending and reigning in monetization and it will be a huge mistake to step in front of this trade.  When you cut the deficit in half... do you realy need all that QE?
Not really.

I am also of the suspicion the the US market has topped out, but this needs further analysis before I can confirm this.

But after watching POG carefully in September, you do not want to be anywhere near this trade on the long side.  I am sorry to be the bearer of bad news but this is almost certain.  I would be reestablishing short positions if not already done in anticipation of a major breakdown in price this fall and continuing into 2014.

I don't like to be the bearer of bad news...  SORRY.


On the other hand

Kandi has finally woken up!   The Chinese govt announced electric vehicle subsidies to the tune of $10,000 per electric vehicle and up to $80,000 for each electric bus sold.  The problem with KNDI stock is that it tends to move in days and then consolidate for months so this movement to the upside may only be temporary.  KNDI has not established a trend. The stock does not close above $8 I think you it will trend down towards a trendline that the stock is trying to establish.  It from today's trading and the candles it looks like you have upside to $8 or $8.50 intraday but without a daily close above $8.  It is hard to confirm any type of momentum past $8.  It is trying to establish a trend so the stock is looking better and better as a momentum play.






Christopher Skidmore


Beat the Market Stock Picks

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Energizer Resources’ Green Giant Demonstrates Potential ‘Top Graphite Mine’ Qualities

Energizer Resources’ Green Giant Demonstrates Potential ‘Top Graphite Mine’ Qualities



Energizer Resources EGZ.T

Share Price…. $0.205
Shares Out… 192.6M
Market Cap… $39.4M



It has been over a year since my visit to Energizer Resources’ (EGZ-T) MadagascarGreen Giant Graphite Project in  May, 2012.  Even at its earliest stages, this massive graphite property, stretching more than 120km looked like a world class mine in the making.  Telltale graphitic staining turned the normally rust colored African dirt to grey everywhere we went.  When we visited the Molo site on the second day and walked th e heart of the Molo Zone, a 300 meter trench continuously mineralized at surface; I was convinced that we were standing on a site that would supply a majority of the world’s graphite needs.   Not that I really knew much about graphite mining back then, but clearly, there was more graphite in Madagascar than the world could ever need.  Even I could see that.

Over the past year the company has completed several key milestones including…
  1.   Completed an initial NI43-101 resources estimate with 9,246m of drilling.
  • 84.0Mt Indicated @ 6.36%C
  • 40.3Mt Inferred @ 6.29%C
  2.   Completed a PEA study indicating robust economics:
  • $162M Capital cost
  • $421M Pre-tax NPV discounted @ 10%
  • 48% Internal rate of return (IRR)
  3.   Greater than 99.9%C in advanced metallurgical studies

  4.  'Large flake’ distributions up to 47.4%

This summer's recent news of excellent flake distributions and high purity have sealed Green Giant as a future mine site.  The market may not yet be convinced, with huge price discrepancies and disagreement in the investment community as to which deposits are ultimately the most economic.  Graphite stocks like Syrah Resources SYR.A and Zenyatta Ventures ZEN.V are worth $300M and $200M, respectively, in market capitalization.  In comparison, other companies like Energizer Resources EGZ.T and Mason Graphite LLG.V, which have arguably just as valuable deposits, if not more, are valued at a paltry $40M and $32M market capitalization.  Never have I seen such disparity between companies within a given sector.  Companies which will be mining graphite within the next 2 years like Energizer, Focus and Northern Graphite are currently being valued at a fraction of the price of companies which do not have a resource or whose confidence is so low you can complete an economic study.  How does that make sense?

Do companies like Syrah and Zenyatta really deserve this type of premium over its peers?  Are low cost producers like Energizer, Focus Graphite and Mason Graphite undervalued as potential mining operations?  This report compares these companies in order to attempt an answer to some of these questions.


The best of ALL WORLDS… Purity, Flake Distribution and Tonnage 

Madagascar graphite is known in the industry as the best graphite in the world.  Madagascar sits on a major continental shear zone.  This is one of the rarest geological formations in the world, located between two massive continental plates resulting in one of the highest temperature environments for mineral deposition.  This high temperature environment led to high purity graphite with very little contaminants being deposited along this shear zone in a hydrothermal process similar to the formation of graphite in the breccia pipes at Zenyatta’s Albany deposit.  Green Giant even has brecciated graphite deposits on the property.  The biggest difference between Albany and Green Giant; is that in Madagascar, the mineralization is on a regional scale stretching along the entire continental shear zone.  The reason the high temperature environment is so important is that it leads to most of the impurities simply being burned away in the deposition process.  What makes Madagascar graphite so unique is that both hydrothermal and metamorphic process were involved in the formation of these deposits resulting in both high purity and extremely large flake graphite formation.  In the graphite world, that is considered to be the best of both worlds.

Green Giant graphite displays all the typical qualities of Madagascar graphite, especially when it comes to large flake distribution and extremely high purity.  The market may not think Energizer has what it takes, but everyone else in the graphite industry does.  DRA and Asbury have stated they are impressed with the high quality nature of Energizer’s graphite.  The high quality nature lends to the graphite being easily purified and worked which gives Energizer more flexibility to give the end user a specific desired product.  It also means processing costs will be low in comparison to other projects which will require more acid to reach the desired purities of the end user.

Energizer has identified three qualities at Green Giant that ensure as a world class graphite mine site in the making. 
  1. High purity graphite in excess of 99.9%C
  2. High percentage of large flake of up to 47.6% (+80 mesh)
  3. Enough tonnage to mine into the 22nd century

Extremely High Purity

EGZ recently reported they achieved 99.9%C on a first-pass single stage hydrometallurgical purification using conventional leach technology test at SGS Canada.   The significance of the news and the corresponding 150% SP increase on July 29th is the potential for VALUE ADDED revenue streams at Energizer’s Molo Project.  99.9% purity means Energizer can sell into VALUE ADDED GRAPHITE MARKETS including spherical graphite manufacturers’ who require the highest purity natural flake graphite.  Energizer Resources will be able to sell this high purity graphite into the market for products like ‘Lithium Ion Batteries’ and ‘Specialty Graphite foils’ which are destined for applications like energy storage and certain refractory applications.   Specialty graphite foils are major components in smart phones, consumer electronics, solar panels, laptops and all flat panel TV and PC screens.

It also means EGZ.T will be able to achieve a high purity with a simple processing flow sheet compared to SYR.A’s Balama which contains vanadium.  Vanadium is not a contaminant for many graphite applications, but if they want to sell their product to the battery manufactures or spherical graphite manufacturers, Syrah will have to process the vanadium out.  Vanadium is a known contaminant in lithium ion batteries.  Balama has low levels of other impurities like Green Giant, but the Vanadium in the deposit will make Syrah go the extra processing step if they want to try to capture the battery market.  Currently, the battery market is very small and wouldn’t support Bisset Creek’s production let alone Syrah's.  Demand for 99.95% graphite for lithium ion batteries was 15,000 tonnes in 2012 with demand split 50/50 between natural and synthetic. The trend is toward replacing synthetic with natural in the majority of lithium ion battery applications.  This market is expected to grow to 120,000 tonnes by 2020.

In addition to achieving 99.9%C purity by leaching the graphite with acid, Energizer upgraded the standard floatation purity results used in the PEA from 94.9%C to 96.3%C.  They also achieved a much higher flake distribution by applying a simpler processing technique by using only a soft grind and gentle polish between floatation ,stages.  The most recent news release was very promising for improving the economics of the Green Giant project.  Not only did Energizer significantly improve results, but they mentioned to me they can even improve upon that!   Energizer can be a little bit more aggressive in polishing and grinding to achieve higher purities with a little less large flake distribution.  This gives Energizer maximum flexibility in tailoring a product to its end user requirements as a refractory would rather have large flake and 97% purity while battery manufacturers are more concerned about purities. 

Ultimately, Energizer’s customers will determine the product mix that the company produces, but the combination of increased large flake distribution and purity will increase average revenue by at least $100 to $200 per tonne from the PEA and decrease operating costs.  Processing costs of $22.90 per tonne milled, (80% of the cost of producing a graphite concentrate) will decrease in the next economic study.
  • Mining costs…..          $4.76/t mined
  • Processing costs….   $22.90/t milled
Instead of receiving $1,400 for their large flake, Energizer will receive $1,500 per tonne; they will be receiving $1,300 per tonne instead of $1,100 for medium flake, and between 10% to 15% of the medium flake will sell as large flake, further enhancing revenues.   This means that no matter where graphite prices go, Energizer will always receive premium pricing in the industry compared to its peers.  

Current Graphite Prices of August  2013

USD$/tonne
(94-97%C)
Large Flake
$1,400 - $1,500
(+80 mesh)
Medium Flake
$1,100 - $1,300
(+100-80 mesh)
Amorphous
$500 - $700
(80-85%C)



High Percentage of Flake Distribution

Energizer may not be the highest grading deposit at 6.3% compared with Balama 10.2% or Lac Gueret at 20.4%; however, when it comes to the distribution table, Green Giant is second to none and shows why flake distribution matters a whole lot more than grade.  Energizer’s large flake distribution (+80 mesh) at Molo is 47.6% while Syrah’s large flake (+75 mesh) runs at around 8%.  Syrah plans on mining 20%C grade ore at start-up while Energizer will be mining 8.5% ore.  Even though Syrah is mining grades 150% higher than Energizer, Energizer will actually produce almost 2 and a half times large flake graphite per tonne, as  the above table shows is significantly more valuable than medium flake or amorphous. 

Company
Project
Grade %C
Purity Achieved
Distribution Chart (um)



Large Flake
Medium Flake
Fines/Amorphous
Energizer Resources EGZ:TSE
Green Giant
6.3% 
99.9% Cgr
+80
47.6%
+15
23.5%
-150
28.9%
Syrah Resources SYR:ASX
Balama
10.2% 
97.0% Cgr
+75
8.0%
+150
45.0%
-150
47.0%
Mason Graphite LLG:CVE
Lac Gueret
20.4% 
96.4% Cgr
+80
30.6%
+150
14.3%
-150
55.1%

Please note that not all -150 mesh is created equal.  Amorphous graphite actually starts at -400 mesh. While Syrah, Focus and Mason all have plenty of -400 mesh graphite, Energizer’s Green Giant has none.  Graphite pricing is set by supply contracts and the prices listed in Industrial Minerals reflect that with only the most popular markets being quoted.  Energizers fines will receive superior pricing to the ‘amorphous’ graphite of other projects. 

If you give zero value to fines/amorphous because it is not certain they have any economic value selling against the Chinese amorphous production, Syrah is mining 150% higher grades, but poor distribution leads to 40% more revenue per tonne for Syrah milled at  $114/t vs. $81/t.  Syrah is still netting more $$$ per tonne in a straight out and out mining scenario, but the difference between revenues and grades is much less than is implied by grade due to Green Giant’s higher quality flake distribution.  
Syrah will net $114 per tonne of ore at 20%C…
  • $24 per tonne for large flake @ $1500/t
  • $90 per tonne for medium flake @ $1,000/t
  • $47 per tonne for fines @ $550/t

Green Giant will net $81 per tonne of ore at 8.5%C…
  • $61 per tonne for large flake @ $1500/t
  • $20 per tonne for medium flake @ $1000/t
  • $12 per tonne for fines @ $500/t
When you factor in Energizer will produce 2.5 times the revenue per tonne of the more desirable large flake, Green Giant has a strategic advantage over a company like Syrah. Amorphous and medium flake markets will be subject to supply shock when Balama comes online while the large flake market is a lot more insulated. Resulting in a much higher pricing risk for medium flake and amorphous graphite markets.  Considering other factors like simpler processing, higher purity and the absence of vanadium in the deposit; Green Giant clealy emerges as the favorable mining scenario for graphite compared to Syrah Resources Balama.

When you analyze future revenue streams of these two planned mines… does a $300M valuation for $114/t while a $33M valuation for $81/t make sense?

Not when mining/milling cost is less than $30/tonne.


Tonnage/Geometry/Scalability

Now this is something I have tried to hammer home since I first wrote about Green Giant: this deposit is undeniably one of largest graphite deposits in the world, if not the biggest.  Green Giant is so big, you can easily locate the telltale grey staining of the deposit on Google Maps and see the trends stretching the entire property for over three hundred kilometers at surface.  Technically Syrah's drilling over a billion tonnes of graphite ore in Mozambique makes them officially bigger; but with mineralization stretching for more than 120km and the deposit being defined for only 1km in strike length Green Giant has more ore on its property than Balama.

Different exploration approaches lead to different results. Energizer chose to drill a small portion on the deposit to do definitive economic studies while Syrah chose the ‘shock and awe’ route of widely spaced holes to demonstrate a large resource.  While Syrah has to go back and drill to raise the confidence of the mineralization to complete even the most basic economic reports, EGZ is working full steam ahead towards and updated economic study this winter which will include all the latest results.  In the long run, Energizer is further ahead towards building a mine than Syrah at Balama, which must initiate another expensive drill program before showing any economic confidence in the deposit.

Green Giant has the greatest exploration upside of any graphite deposit in the world.  It covers a much wider area than Balama or Graphite Creek and the graphite is proving to be the best anywhere in the world.  When looking at new mine sites to be the backbone of a developing materials sector like graphite, you want to pick sites that have longevity and the ability to ramp up production in a timely and cost effective manner.  But if you want to build the next world class mine in the graphite sector, you need to have tonnage to bring all the pieces of the pie together.  Green Giant, Balama, and to a lesser extent Graphite Creek, all exhibit these qualities; have high quality graphite AND the capacity to expand production with the capability to mine into the 22nd century.   

 Just to give you an idea of the capacity of these new graphite discoveries…

Green Giant has the capacity to produce the entire current flake market.

Just think about these dizzying numbers for a second.   If you built a mine the size Western Copper’s WRN-T Casino (a 100,000 tonne conventional copper mine plus 25,000tpd heap leach), Green Giant would produce well over 2Mt of graphite per year of all types and purities. 

100,000tpd times 0.06%Cg = 6,000 tonnes of graphite per day
6,000 tonnes times 365 days = 2,190,000 tonnes of graphite per annum

With Green Giant’s recent flake distribution numbers and purities:
  • 1.04Mt @ 96.8%C (+80 mesh)
  • 0.51Mt @ 95.6%C (+150-80 mesh)
  • 0.63Mt @ 95.7%C (-150 mesh) 
2.19MT of graphite per year!!!

With the large flake averaging the highest standard the industry has pricing for.  

Do you get it yet?

That is almost double the current size the ENTIRE GRAPHITE MARKET.

Do you understand why it is "game over" for most flake graphite explorers yet?  Especially those with smaller deposits, something that is world class similar to Green Gaint or with grades like Lac Kinfe or Lac Geuret will have to be discovered to ever convince anyone to build a mine when you have BEHEMOTHS like Green Giant and Balama going into production in the next 3 or 4 years. These two monsters can simply pump out flake at a fraction of the cost because they can take advantage of economies of scale that smaller deposits cannot.   In the end, the small players just won’t be able to pump out graphite cheap enough to survive and be able to compete with Green Giant or Balama.  You are going to have to have a specialty product like lump or show such impressive distributions of large flake AND purities to continue in the game with the ‘Big Boys.’

Not even the Chinese will be able to pump out high purity graphite as inexpensively as Energizer will be able to at Green Giant.

No mine will ever start out producing graphite at that rate because you would drown yourself in graphite stockpiles.  The market simply cannot handle and isn’t ready for it. Green Giant is a site that can easily be ramped up over the decades as anticipated demand for graphite grows.  The mining industry would be nuts to bank all their hopes on one mine when the whole graphite argument came about because of security of supply. The market could support at least 2 or 3 major mines outside of China, especially when the mines promise to be competitive against Chinese flake production.  Why would you risk it all in one mine?  It would be absolute craziness.  Right now it appears the TWO heavyweights in the graphite industry outside of China will be Balama in Mozambique and Green Giant in Madagascar.

While Balama will be primarily a bulk medium flake producer, Green Giant will be known as a large flake producer and produce the most large flake graphite of any planned mine. This niche makes Green Giant special and unique as it looks like everyone has the ability to achieve high purity results while not everyone possess the large flake that Green Giant does.  In fact, Green Giant will produce almost half of the incremental large flake graphite from 4 planned mines; Lac Knife, Lac Gueret, Balama, and Green Giant.   EGZ.T and SYR.A planned start-up rates of 220,000 and 84,000 tonnes of graphite per annum, repecitvely, would represent close to a 30% increase in supply of the material over the next few years.  AND AGAIN, not to hammer it home or anything, but the big thing, vital for putting down production roots outside China, is that both deposits can easily match ANY INCREASE IN DEMAND unlike Lac Knife or Lac Gueret which are restricted in capacity due to limitations on the size of the resource.

According to Industrial Minerals, graphite demand is expected to increase to 235,000t by 2016 under a base case scenario.  Demand is expected to increase to 528,000t under a bullish case scenario.   Just between Energizer and Syrah, that is 304,000t.  When including from the high grade Quebec mines Lac Knife and Lac Gueret; another 100,000t of incremental supply is added to the market.  That is enough graphite from 4 mines to meet 80% of the forecasted demand in the most bullish of cases.

The biggest question in my mind is will it be the right type of graphite?  310,000t of that graphite will be -80 mesh.


Graphite MineTotal Graphite ProductionLarge FlakeMedium FlakeFines
Green Giant84,000t40,000t @ 96.3%C19,720t @ 95.6%C24,280t @ 95.7%C
Lac knife43,600t14,600t @ 98.3%C12,990 @ 98.2%C16,000t @ ~98%C
Lac Gueret50,000t15,300t @ ~96%C7,136t @ ~96%C27,569t @ ~96%C
Balama220,000t17,600t @ ~97%C99,000 @ ~97%C103,400t @ ~97%C
Incremental Graphite Supply397,600t87,500t138,800t171,300t



A future flood of Medium Flake?

A future glut of medium flake and amorphous may be on the horizon.  310,000t of medium flake and fines/amorphous is a lot of supply for the market to absorb, especially when a large portion of incremental demand is going to be for large flake graphite.   In the base case scenario of 235,000, if just half the new demand is for large flake, it could even put the squeeze of on large flake prices while medium and amorphous prices fall due to oversupply.

The big elephant in the room regarding medium flake is Syrah’s Balama.  Approximately 99,000 tonnes of medium flake graphite will come onto the market when Balama goes into production.  Nearly a quarter the entire flake graphite market AND almost triple the combined medium flake production of Lac Knife, Green Giant and LAc Gueret.  99,000 tonnes of medium flake is a lot for the market to handle and could ultimately drive medium flake prices lower, closer to other medium flake producers cost of production.

A 47.6 large flake distribution gives Energizer a huge advantage and leverage as a mine producing a high demand product that other planned mines just cannot produce. This certainly gives Green Giant an advantage in pricing risk vs. Balama and gives a much better assurance of the net present value and return on investment on the project.  Large flake prices will be a lot more stable and may even enjoy a larger premium over medium flake in the future.


Potential to be one of the LOWEST COST graphite mines

The new discoveries made in the graphite sector in 2012 promise to be the cornerstones of graphite production for the next century.  These deposits represent the low hanging fruit in the industry.  They are the biggest graphite deposits in the world.  They have excellent purity, grade from 4% to 20%, and are cash cows at current graphite prices.  Green Giant, Balama, Lac Knife, and Lac Gueret all have merit as legitimate graphite mining operations.  They are world class flake graphite deposits which promise to meet the world’s graphite demands.  What makes these projects stand out above the rest is the fact that all these mining operations promise to be some of the lowest cost mines in the graphite industry.  Mines with a cost so low, they will be able to compete against Chinese flake producers.

Energizer Resource’s Molo may even be the lowest cost producing large flake graphite mine once fully up in operation. 

Mines that could flood the ‘Chinese Flake’ market?!?!?!

One factor you need to look at when building a graphite mine is meeting or exceeding the Chinese cost of production.   Chinese graphite mines can produce flake graphite between $350 and $900 per tonne.  According to my conversations with Energizer management who have toured the 4 of China’s larger graphite operations, the current Chinese cost of production before freight ranges from $350 to $450 per tonne.  The smaller, more remote, mom and pop operations can exceed $900 per tonne which is on par with Northern Graphite’s cost of production and the cost of production threshold for any graphite mine.  This certainly puts Green Giant and the smaller higher grade operations competitive against Chinese production of large and medium flake graphite.

Estimates for Green Giant range depending on different variables, but under the most basic scenario Molo is estimated to produce large flake graphite concentrate at around $418 per tonne (ex-freight) which is similar to the lowest cost Chinese producers.  The higher grade  Quebec operations such as Lac Knife and Lac Gueret are also competitive because they have such a high grade only mine a small amount for a high output.  These mines are estimated at $435/t for Lac Knife and $390/t for Lac Gueret.

The $418/t cost estimate for Molo is just for start-up production.  Management expects to be able to reduce these costs further by optimizing operations and using synergies with the nearby developing Sakoa Coal Fields. Currently, the Green Giant PEA is not optimized for mining, with initial plans including expensive containerized diesel as primary energy source.  Synergies with Sakoa Coal Project could bring costs down close to $250 per tonne with the addition of power, heavy oil and paved roads to the project.  The PEA was also done in South African Rand indicating further enhancements converting the PEA to the appreciating USD. Test shipments are being made to the Port of Soalara later this year from Sakoa, which means Green Giant will have access to the cost saving infrastructure sooner than later.

Another big factor is processing, currently at 80% of the cost of producing a concentrate.  Energizer achieved better results from the PEA by applying a softer grind to the graphite.  A simpler and less intense process could result in further processing cost savings than was initially indicated in the PEA released in February.   The PEA was considered extremely conservative to start, but even if Energizer comes close to the targets in the PEA and then add further enhancements and synergies, Green Giant could be mined for $200 to $250 per tonne before they ship it to the coast.

$250 per tonne vs. $350 per tonne?!?!??!

If cost estimates are remotely accurate, this is quite a role reversal from 20 years ago when the Chinese flooded the market with graphite, putting Uley and Kringel out of business while mothballing projects like Bisset Creek and  Lac Knife.

The Chinese have lost nearly all advantages that made them low cost producers and they don’t have the biggest advantage of all: limitless graphite resources to source from for the next 100 plus years that will enjoy all the synergies from economies of scale. The current Chinese flake mines are mining flake near the Russian border and trucking ore 3000km to the nearest purification plants at a highly subsidized $100/tonne cost which virtually nullifies Energizer’s transportation cost of $105/t.  I expect Energizer will eventually tie into rail to the coast, which will all but eliminate the transportation cost giving Energizer’s Green Giant that much more of a cushion on the Chinese competition.

Consdering these factors:
  • Chinese mines are depleting in grade and a quality.
  • Chinese have lost a wage advantage mining  wages rise towards a global wage
  • Energizer has optimal flake distribution percentages at Molo.
  • Energizer has the purest flake commanding premium pricing
  • Green Giant is the largest graphite deposit defined by area anywhere in the world ensuring limitless supply of graphite for years.
  • Molo has the potential to be the lowest cost producer in the industry once in full production.   

Low Cost Production Makes You King

Some people say grade is king.  Well they are partially correct.  Grade is usually king because it makes a low cost producer.  So, in my opinion, low cost mining is king.  But grade is a good determinant of low cost production.   I don’t have to tell you how significant it is to be the lowest cost producer in the industry, especially when 70% of the industry originates in one country.  The biggest reason low cost production is so important is that it dramatically reduces the risk of the project’s long term viability through any and all types of markets. It ensures a profit before your competition and it ensures your company a competitive advantage for life.  It means that you are king of the miners within that given sector and everyone looks to you to lead the market place.  You set the market price.  Even in the worst markets, it is your production that still makes it to the end user.

How did the Chinese capture the REE and graphite markets over the last 25 years and put mines like Mountain Pass and Uley out of business?  

Simply by having the lowest cost production in the industry.  

They could not have flooded the market without the lowest cost production, no matter how much China subsidized the miners. This is why I am so high on specific projects like Green Giant and Balama and Lac Gueret.  These projects have all the desired qualities to become world class graphite mines that will lead the industry into the 21st century and display qualities to be low cost industry leaders:
  • They are massive graphite deposits which have 100+ year mine lives, with scalability
  • They are in strategic locations close to water in Alaska, Madagascar, and Mozambique
  • They are high grade deposits with even higher grade cores
  • All 3 have excellent metallurgical results and the potential for value added markets, such as spherical graphite and receive premium pricing.
Everything that anyone could want in a graphite mine, these projects have.  Tonnage, grade, purity and an ideal location close to water in politically safe jurisdictions.  These projects will ensure a cheap and reliable source of flake graphite for years to come.

A typical flake graphite mine in China now mines flake for $350 to $450 per tonne.
Green GiantLac GueretLac Knife
Stage of DevelopmentPEAPEAPEA
Mine Size3,000tpd500tpd800tpd
Production84,000tpa50,0000tpa43,600tpa
Average Selling Price$1,564/tonne$1,525/tonne$4,490/tonne*
Production Costs$418/tonne**$390/tonne$435/tonne
Mine Life20 years22 years20 years
Capital Cost$162M$107.9M$154M
Pre-tax NPV @ 10%$421M$283M$246M
IRR48%33.7%32%
Payback3 years2.5 years2.8 years













*Focus Metals uses $10,000 price for their 99.95%C product, most likely materially overstated.
**$105/tonne freight has been excluded from cost structure for comparison purposes.



Christopher Skidmore

Beat the Market Stock Picks